Re: <nettime> Christianity and Cruelty

[Steven Kurtz via nettime-l <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>]

David, cruelty is a difficult one. Describing CN violence as cruelty is mostly us outsiders looking in at CN. You might start with CN Joe Rigney's book "The Sin of Empathy." From the CN perspective, Christian men (as the leaders and the top of the social hierarchy) have to stay morally strong to do what is necessary to protect their family and faith. As God above does when He sees sin running amok amongst sinners who have no thought of pleading for forgiveness, the punishment is fast and violent. As you point out the creation of hell is the corker. The CNs believe the fathers of earth below must follow the example set by the Father of heaven. If your wife or daughter was to be possessed by the "Jezabel spirit" (something they are deathly afraid of), a husband needs to be able to deal with it by whatever means necessary and without hesitation. Empathy will cloud that moral judgment, and in turn, the will to act. The same is true with the political body. A man must be ready to act without mercy, remorse, or hesitation with whatever means are necessary should someone or an institution come for one's religion or religious liberty, or anything that undermines the advancement of establishing God's Kingdom on earth. Such action is not cruelty, but the way of God. The sin is to fail to do what God wills.

BTW, these ideas on punishment, violence, and empathy as sin are based on terrible theology. Even an amateur in Christian theology like me can see it.  I never know how far to go with this. I can explain it if you want.

________________________________
From: nettime-l <nettime-l-bounces@lists.nettime.org> on behalf of David Garcia via nettime-l <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2025 9:30 AM
To: nettime-l@lists.nettime.org <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
Cc: David Garcia <dgarcia@bournemouth.ac.uk>
Subject: <nettime> Christianity and Cruelty

The Christian Nationalism that Steve Kurtz has researched and highlighted so vividly in recent days appears as a world away from the Christianity of Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde. Her direct public plea to Trump for ‘mercy’ was one of the more effective interventions since his re-election. Its potency came in part from the way it separated this regime’s most alarming and morally disfiguring vice from any particular set of policies, the vice of cruelty.

The worst of the many vices Trump and his minions have displayed is their cruelty. Cruelty that is exultant, relentless, swaggering, shameless and performative. Many previous administrations have exhibited a full spectrum of vices, exploitation, prejudice, cowardice, elitism, snobbery, self-delusion, treachery and above all hypocrisy. But few have been as enthusiastically and vindictively cruel. So maybe its worth asking whether there are ways in which the obvious but under emphasised fact of Trumpian cruelty can be given greater prominence in the struggle to forge a more energetic culture of resistance.

Do the Democrats have some version of CPAC where they can do more than lick their wounds? There are times when even hate can be an effective instrument of resistance, in this case hatred of Trump’s cruelty. Maybe the revulsion that most of us feel for this vice’s fearful ugliness has exposed a rare achilleas heal.

As the philosopher Judith Shklar pointed out in 1981[Putting Cruelty First] Christianity cannot escape complicity in the tendency to neglect this vice. It is not even one of the 7 deadly sins. Neither does it feature in the 10 commandments. Moreover, the countless representations of the torments of hell awaiting sinners appears to suggest that cruelty has been granted divine dispensation. “Perhaps” she argued “the extent of divinely sanctioned cruelty makes it impossible to think of cruelty as a distinct and unmitigated evil” Surely this makes it easier for the CN to tolerate or even welcome Trumpian cruelty, even seeing it as evidence of Trump as an unwitting instrument of divine retribution.



________________________________

BU is a Disability Confident Employer and has signed up to the Mindful Employer charter. Information about the accessibility of University buildings can be found on the BU AccessAble webpages.
This email is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email, which must not be copied, distributed or disclosed to any other person.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Bournemouth University or its subsidiary companies. Nor can any contract be formed on behalf of the University or its subsidiary companies via email.
--
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nettime.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Csjkurtz%40buffalo.edu%7C92f7b284aef04d7147d108dd6ec5fca8%7C96464a8af8ed40b199e25f6b50a20250%7C0%7C0%7C638788518805145164%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NWLTjeAvtoiuQpUE2XkZKobrjWyq7fRYwWnTD1FDfxA%3D&reserved=0<https://www.nettime.org/>
# contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org
-- 
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://www.nettime.org
# contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org