tbyfield on Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:57:57 +0200 (CEST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: <nettime> Guardian Live on Assange's arrest


*Semi*-voluntary is just a statement of fact, not an evaluation: he had more choices than someone entirely in custody. None of those choices were good, and, like I said, I don't think any of them could have changed this outcome — that, sooner or later, he'd be physically removed from the embassy.
A certain measure of normalization is inevitable: there are kids who 
were born after Assange entered the embassy but know his name. I think 
the issue is what *kind* of normalization. As Felix and you both point 
out, albeit in very different ways, the widespread adoption of 
Wikileaks's basic vocabulary — both as ways of working and as 
historical context — is another form.
You give Assange more credit than he's due for changing public 
discourse, I think. The exposure of classified military and diplomatic 
materials has been going on for half a century or more, and there are 
organizations — say, the National Security Archive in the US, and 
other  entities in other countries — that have been actively working 
in a sort of proto-Wikileaks 'space' for decades. If anything, the more 
promising aspect of Wikileaks wasn't the leaks, it was the wiki — the 
hope that leaking could become pervasive and transformative (I'm tempted 
to say, *be normalized*). I'd argue that Assange himself turned out to 
be one of the greatest obstacles to that hope. But, as absurd as it may 
sound, I don't say any of this to diminish his impact or to diss him: 
the best respect is to think carefully about what he *did* accomplish.
I tried to get at some of this several years ago, in point/counterpoint 
piece with Florian Cramer that Mute ~commissioned in 2011:
http://www.metamute.org/editorial/articles/wikileaks-has-radically-altered-military-diplomatic-information-complex-%E2%80%93-10-reasons-and-against

Cheers,
Ted


On 11 Apr 2019, at 13:02, Morlock Elloi wrote:

What was the voluntary part? Lifelong imprisonment in the US or execution are viable alternatives?
The amount of normalization is staggering. And it works.

From left-talk about revelations of criminal election rigging being far bigger crime than the criminal rigging itself (cretins on the left still believe it, also that Assange is a rapist), to forgetting how Wikileaks profoundly changed the public discourse (cables, war logs, collateral murder, vault, etc etc.) how it saved Snowden from chains, how it enabled effective whistleblowing.
And it is enabled mainly by cretins on the left living in psychotic 
denial of reality.
Now watch the sad show of British and their judicial system as they 
bend over to receive the final ejaculation ... state-size necrophilia.
semi-voluntary confinement
 <...>
#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: