E. Miller on Thu, 8 Sep 2005 23:18:26 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> A Progressive Response to Katrina |
Hi Michael (and Nettime), I'll keep this relatively short after my epic email earlier this week. Just a few points: -- By no stretch of the imagination would I assert that FEMA and the Bush administration shouldn't be held accountable. As bad as some of the local failures were, the Feds were the only ones in a position to really make a difference. They failed miserably. And their failure was even more egregious given that it wasn't that they didn't have the resources (like the local officials) but that they bungled planning, management, initiative, response, you name it. Absolutely inexcusable, and we can definitely lay the blame for that on the Bush administration and what they've done to FEMA through spending cuts and ideology. -- I would differentiate between the act of rebuilding community and restoring the built environment. I absolutely agree that we owe it to those underprivileged communities to do the former, especially given that we had essentially abandoned those communities to fend for themselves for decades. My point was that the built environment that housed these communities was ecologically unsound, dangerous, and was part of the segregationist infrastructure of New Orleans. I think that we have to realize that exact replicas of many pre-hurricane New Orleans neighborhoods would simply be re-creating institutions of southern poverty and racism. -- And finally, on the appropriate response from the progressive left. My apologies for the flippant 'study groups' comment, it was a bit much on the rhetorical side. I would just say that we need to put forth clear and authoritative ideas that inspire, that show leadership, that give the electorate and the citizenry some intellectual traction so that they can believe that we are able to lead the nation in the right direction. Not half measures, not negative complaining, not equivocating, not just Lakoff's framing debates semantically, not lamenting Carter-ish 'malaise', not calculated Clinton-ish triangulation, not wallowing in the grey areas on every issue. Lead. And we need to do it now. Nettime is full of incredibly smart people. I'm regularly amazed by what I read from you folks. So that's my challenge to this group: help give us progressives a framework, a clear articulation of ideals, a clear and pragmatic progressive vision unrestrained by dogma, that we can contrast against the clearly articulated vision of the conservative movement. Give us the vision of JFK, not the muddle of Foucault. We need it now. Now. Eric # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net