Amy Alexander on Tue, 31 Jul 2001 07:20:11 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> sig translation |
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, geert lovink wrote: <quoting my sig>: > > Recontextualizing script-kiddyism as net-art for over 1/20 of a century. > > that's a great line. but then how do you respond to rop's posting to the > script kiddies (the text patrice ffw)? maybe it's better to proclaim it > net.art as it is to label sk hacktivism? (if you could answer on list that > would be great) > i thought rop's text to the HAL script kiddies: http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/wilma_hiliter/nettime/200107/msg00128.html?line=31#hilite which basically said, "don't show up at HAL and start breaking into systems from there..." was right on... lets hope they take it to heart... but the reference to script-kiddyism in my sig is an acknowledgment of the "other side" of script kiddies... not the famous end result of breaking into computers for no good reason, but rather the amateurist means to the end. a lot of script kiddies' bad rep comes from more experienced crackers, who are disdainful of the script kiddies because they don't really understand what they're doing (technically), don't write their own exploits, and merely work from freely available scripts to break into systems. but i think this attitude is a bit of technical elitism and auteurism. starting from others' work is how people learn - and most successful script kiddies discover they do need to figure some things out/apply some of their own elbow grease to the code they've downloaded to actually make a break-in happen (and leave some backdoors, and set up their warez site on the owned server, and....) this copy/paste/adapt method is how a lot of programmers learn, and if you think about it, it's even part of open source philosophy, the GPL, etc. (i.e. you can copy and modify things, just credit what you copied and what you modified. and don't bother reinventing the wheel; there are more important things to do.) it also allows emphasis to be placed on the aesthetics of the concept, not the authorship of the code itself. back to plagiarist.org - a lot of the projects there are dynamic - and when i wanted to start doing those (back in 1846 or so), i was clueless about perl, but i knew that with unix i could piece together various scripts to get them to do what i wanted. because i had to adapt things to my specific situation, i learned largely through reverse engineering. gradually i got more proficient and so as time went on i wound up writing more things from scratch, but still, one has to admit that one copies from one's own earlier code, at least, even when programming "from scratch." so a lot of the projects on plagiarist.org are built from this script-kiddie mentality of copy/paste/adapt-to-new-situation/learn-something, or to put another way, hack the old to make something new... (if you think about it, this is not so different than visually-produced work - for example, an artist might use photoshop to make an image, so in effect, they've used photoshop code in their image making. but now we get into adrian ward's territory - i.e. http://www.auto-illustrator.com) ... many of the plagiarist.org projects actually tie together several scripts; maybe we call that "script collaging... " :-) anyway, thus the sig, in sympathy with the script kiddie. optional reading: "The Death and Rebirth of Plagiarism" http://www.coe.ilstu.edu/rpriegle/wwwdocs/plagiari.htm note, i don't entirely agree with above-mentioned essay. in particular, it seems to imply that plagiarism and original thought are generally mutually- exclusive - i definitely think that's not the case. (maybe it's another one of these cases of differentiating the authorship of the "code" of texts from the aesthetics of the way they are combined and reused. <shrug>) ciao4now, -@ -- plagiarist.org Recontextualizing script-kiddyism as net-art for over 1/20 of a century. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net