Nmherman on 25 Feb 2001 20:04:21 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: questions for 15 minutes (old mail from Rhizome) |
Subj: RHIZOME_RAW: A Disjointed Reaction to the Genius 2000 Video Date: 8/7/99 12:43:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: fluxis@MEDIAONE.NET (INFOSLUT 2000) Sender: owner-list@rhizome.org To: list@rhizome.org Revolution is fought in america no longer by riots or revolutionaries but by the individual in daily routines. It is not a political war and it is not a violent war. It is a war that achieves very real success by fighting with plastic water guns rather than bullets. You can trace everything in recent American history to this battle within the self. The lack of self-confrontation. The Columbine High School Students were two boys demanding access in a world that had given access only to reebok and car commercials. Monica Lewinskys lips were the lips asking for access, and The Kosovo bombings were America's collective attempt to pretend its lack of access was tolerable. But meanwhile as a collective the American agenda will not be changed by a woodstock riot or a new John F Kennedy Messiah. The change takes place in individual cognition. Genius 2000 is not neccesarily looking for a group of zealots, more or less it is demanding that those who are not zealots ask themselves why not, and that those who are zealots ask themselves why. Essentially Genius 2000 is the derivitive of the classic belief that the answers to questions were internal, so long as you knew the questions. There is an almost imperceptably audible click when you know you've got the right answer or the right idea. Genius 2000 is the attempt to question the foundations of those clicks, not to change the burned out lightbulbs over peoples heads, but to get them to realize that they're even there to begin with. A few things happened after watching the genius2000 video. I went to a book store and picked up the beginners guide to Noam Chomsky. Was it intentional, all the inclusions of people stating that y2000 was not important to them, but they believed that the importance placed on it by others would make it important? The importance of yhwh, the idea also of the 27(?) letter name for god; the original intent of which was to prove that god was unspeakable, creates a mass of zealots who instead dedicate their lives to the attempt to pronounce it [an act of violence against the ideology of sacredness- which seems to construct a relative idea of "location" as an isolated sacred moment/place/person. Which, in the wake of postmodernism- which is perhaps the last movement in the pagan non-secular religion of art- is to use that notion of "seperation" and apply to the whole, to "seperate everything" as sacred.] The idea- "What if the year 2000 is the start of the world?" is a compelling one. Because we look at the state of hopelessness left by modern culture/religion/media, the idea of being displaced from the sublime and meaningful, all the idols smashed. Perhaps the start of the world, stems from that hopelessness, perhaps the start of the world is the recognition of individual genius. We are forced not to rebuild a hope but to hope for the real, vs the intangible "after-death", paradise. That is perhaps the year 2000...or the revolution, or the new messiah, they are all a metaphor anyway, for "god" as we have lost him. The idea of the millenium of paradise after the apocalypse...we could claim, spiritually, that the last millenium has been the first corruption of christianity [as in the original Jesus; the smashing of spectacle, the first true subversion of media [as Genius 2000 claims it to be, if we take that for granted- that the crucifiction was demand for access, then christianity as in vatican/pope was the first commercial declaration of, the first bastardization, its own subversion.] Then perhaps we are living the apocalypse, the bloodiest millenium the world will see. Perhaps the destruction of these false opiates which once provided hope is the true progress. The year 2000 holds the destruction of the dead soul as in the promise kept after death and the resurrection of the "living soul." Perhaps we have lived with the idea of isolated events as sacred, certain people as genius, certain ideas as true, in order to hold that element of specialness, in order to remember what specialness is, and then to forget what, exactly, is special, and to create an "isolated everything" phenomenon. The year 2000 is not the date set for the monolith to descend on mankind and elevate them to this state of mind. Rather its interesting to see projections of the utopia everyone wishes for but no one will work towards, as in, everyone knows what the messiah is, they just refuse to construct (or deconstruct?) it for themselves. I hope this document spawns some feedback. I should hope to extend this dialogue far beyond the genius 2000 sphere- which is integral for genius 2000 to remain in a state of becoming. Genius 2000 is not an end all "movement," merely one chapter in the encyclopedia that documents the struggle for subtlety in the face of the obscene. Thats the schizophrenic nature of America. + + + -> RHIZOME COMMUNICATIONS -> post: list@rhizome.org -> questions: info@rhizome.org -> answers: http://www.rhizome.org -> unsubscribe: http://www.rhizome.org/unsubscribe/ + + + posts to RHIZOME RAW are subject to the terms set out in the Subscriber Agreement available online at <http://www.rhizome.org/subscribe/>. ----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- Return-Path: <owner-list@dont.panix.com> Received: from aol.com (rly-yh03.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.35]) by air-yh05.mail.aol.com (v60.18) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Aug 1999 03:43:49 -0400 Received: from dont.panix.com (dont.panix.com [166.84.0.211]) by rly-yh03.mx.aol.com (v60.18) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Aug 1999 03:43:46 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by dont.panix.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/PanixLC1.6) id DAA11738 for list-outgoing; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 03:36:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from chmls06.mediaone.net (chmls06.mediaone.net [24.128.1.71]) by dont.panix.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/PanixLC1.6) with ESMTP id DAA11728 for <list@rhizome.org>; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 03:36:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mediaone.net (transangel.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.155.9]) by chmls06.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA00622 for <list@rhizome.org>; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 03:36:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <37ABE0E9.885168B6@mediaone.net> Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 03:31:53 -0400 From: INFOSLUT 2000 <fluxis@MEDIAONE.NET> Organization: www.one38.org X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: list@rhizome.org Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: A Disjointed Reaction to the Genius 2000 Video Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-list@rhizome.org Precedence: bulk _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold