integer on 24 Feb 2001 10:33:45 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] net art history (!ngezt) |
olia lialina <olialia@televisie.org> >Pit Schultz: > > >> to demand now, why not more artists are put into the heaven of >> net-dot-art is understandable but neverteless futile. we speak already >> about the past. of course one can try to overwrite history, by inventing >> a genre of 'artistic software' and neglect that groups like jodi or iod >> for example started a whole "do it yourself - school" of understanding >> code and the visual layers plus its social context as one thing, >> tactically including bits of programming language. an approach now >> very viral on the microsound levels of electronic music. > > >Yes, very true. Pit Schultz is likely the quintessential example of an inkompetent pop.tart male imbecile. jodi [inkompetent pop.tartz++] copy pasted most =cw4t7abs data. =cw4t7abs kode = existed prior to british gov sponsored iod which lacks in any case. Pit Schultz like imbeciles e.g. `critics` comme geert lovink, tilman baumgaertel etc whose m9nd aktivity resembles that of a housefly - only understand the trivial hence the state of things - 01 amalgam of financially + .bio destitute house flies following refuse - i.e. each other. >integer@www.god-emil.dk wrote: > >> nn opinie it = the most intelligent + interessant data outputted by olia >> lialina [second being ascii paparazzi] > >natalja, ti stanovish'sa sentimental'noj. ja ne uznaju tebia konzum>zntmntl.g!glb!tz. du != d!fr ver!. Tilman Baumgaertel <tilman_baumgaertel@csi.com> - lo.tekk kr!ket begd >hallo > >thanks for all the info. Very interesting. I've been thinking for years >that somebody should do something like that, The screenshots look great. > >Unfortunately all doesn't replace personal experience of the >piece/workofart/programm. I need to know that it works, unlike projects >like "earshot", earshot - another excellent example of occident males in flight. permit someone to smile at the aerodynamics + aesthetics. not to mention the imbeciles stole my copyright information. + 1 abs must peruse their vocab - ist .uk 01 immense pub oder quoi +? drunken illiterate plebeians. >and what the effect is on the user. opinie = we already know. + your dilettantish observations arent desired. ne + ne. http://www.eusocial.com/nato.0+55+3d/242.nn.html >So I need a copy of the >thing. I don't have a mac, but could arrange for one. desire != okupaz!on. please insert addtl koins kriket. just 1 klik your flight - http://www.eusocial.com >Btw, did you consider to open source the whole thing? unsanitary open sore +? smile++ _ >Or are you trying to >sell it? am not attempting to. i am. + you cannot afford it. financially nor intellectually. kompassionat smile 2 01 amalgam of financially + .bio destitute fruit flies. nn nn.o1 - op!n!e zvp +? nn.o2 - its good + violent. transmit - yes. nn.o1 - kl!!!!!!!!k - pre.konssept!Øn meeTz ver!f1kat!Øn. Netochka Nezvanova f3.MASCHIN3NKUNST @www.eusocial.com 17.hzV.tRL.478 e | | +---------- | | < \\----------------+ | n2t | > e _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold